Arrest Warrant Arizona 2013

* Arrest Warrants Search Engine *

Try one of the most accurate and safe
Arrest warrants Search Engine...

arrest warrant arizona

arrest warrant arizona
Phoenix, AZ (PRWEB) April 1, 2006

On Friday, March 24, 2006, civil, human, and childrens correct advocate Rev. John W. Stone was granted a Not Responsible Arraignment.

&#13

The “Not Guilty Arraignment” was held after the preliminary listening to was vacated, and prior to the true supervening indictment was given to him. Stone says that this act was one of a number of functions to purposely deny his thanks procedure legal rights.????

&#13

Stone is getting held at the 4th Avenue Jail in Phoenix given that March 8, 2006 on a $ 250,000.00 income only bail for a single depend of aggravated harassment.

&#thirteen

The demand was made by Kent Harding, former landlord and operator of Lighthouse House loan Organization in Phoenix, and principal defendant in the Stones lawsuit filed March two, 2006, now pending in the Superior Court docket in Phoenix. Harding, is accused of the theft of the Stones property.

&#13

The Stones house, including incriminating evidence in opposition to Harding and other people, was alleged to have been stolen on September 8, 2005 with the Stones’ other house. This celebration occurred soon after Stone and spouse submitted a chapter eleven individual bankruptcy and a civil legal rights and personal bankruptcy racketeering lawsuit in the Federal District Court in Phoenix.

&#thirteen

In accordance to Stone, several officials ended up instantly notified repeatedly relating to the theft, including the personal bankruptcy court docket, the federal district court docket but, the Stones were disregarded.

&#13

An official law enforcement report was submitted on November 20, 2005, with the Peoria Law enforcement, which checklist the Stones as crime victims and is even now pending. Stones spouse is planning supplemental expenses to that report concerning Stones false arrest for harassment that directly stems from the theft of their property on September eight, 2005.

&#13

On September 13, 2005, Harding obtained an injunction from one of the judges named as a defendant in the Stones federal situation following a number of telephone calls from the Stones to get better their property in Hardings possession. Stone was unaware of the injunction towards him right up until he was served the get the later part of January 2006.

&#thirteen

The Stones believe that simply because they ended up acting in the curiosity of the general public as excellent Samaritans, they are being condemned and punished due to the fact of lawfully pursuing corrupt officials. They allege that the felony acts, such as the injunction, is component of a conspiracy to oppress and corruptly interfere with their individual bankruptcy, their organizations and lawsuits, which they say had an influence that completed precisely that.

&#thirteen

Case laws penalize the prosecution for functions of theft and failing to protect proof. These situations show that the theft of the evidence prevents the Stones thanks procedure in all existing and potential litigation.

&#13

Stone claims that he is planning to use skilled testimony to prove damages to himself, his loved ones, their organizations, creditors, their lawsuits, and the hurt to a small with a well being condition and scholastics.

&#13

Stone suggests that he will be revealing a long record of witnesses, court docket orders, and other documents. Witness list will contain Governor Napolitano, Arizona legislators, and other officials like President Bush. Specific individuals, as properly as 3rd party victims will also be called to testify.

&#13

The Stones allege that the fake arrest and illegal imprisonment has aided Harding and accomplices, and has made much more crimes from them and has brought on historic revelations and exposures.

&#thirteen

Stone, a civil legal rights advocate as well as a firm advocate in opposition to murderers, says that he is incarcerated with accused murders and other hardened criminals, positioning him in a compromising place. He has discovered in paper perform of other prisoners, proof of misconduct and collusion by the prosecution and community defenders that could totally free murderers and other individuals.

&#thirteen

Stone suggests that it is not that the prisoners are innocence. Its just that the technicalities and misconduct, if pursued, could free of charge many prisoners like individuals who need to not go free of charge.

&#thirteen

Meanwhile, Stone statements that he has been denied his constitutional secured rights and should be released that daily that he isnt, compounds the violations.

&#13

Rule fifteen.6 underneath Arizona prison procedure states that “disclosure” is firmly ordered that the prosecution has a duty to make continuing disclosures. Stone claims that no disclosures have been manufactured to him regarding the evidence towards him, so much. More on story at: http://www.theexposure.com&#thirteen

&#thirteen

# # #

&#thirteen
&#thirteen
&#13
&#13
&#thirteen